remove lasso + elastic net from regular checks

[ethanglaser]

Description

Ref: #168, #185, uxlfoundation/scikit-learn-intelex#3418

CI on main: http://intel-ci.intel.com/f1a99f30-60cb-f12e-bffe-724646f3d540
CI on this branch: http://intel-ci.intel.com/f1b5e609-bc80-f142-b4ed-02b0127b0ae1

Checklist:

Completeness and readability

• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes or created a separate PR with updates and provided its number in the description, if necessary.
• Git commit message contains an appropriate signed-off-by string (see CONTRIBUTING.md for details).
• I have resolved any merge conflicts that might occur with the base branch.

Testing

• I have run it locally and tested the changes extensively.
• All CI jobs are green or I have provided justification why they aren't.
• I have extended testing suite if new functionality was introduced in this PR.

---

[ethanglaser]

The predicament of needing this update for private CI with main sklearnex branch but it failing in public CI...

[avolkov-intel]

this update should already be on main, I guess you need to rebase

[avolkov-intel]

The PR itself looks fine to me, although we can only merge it when CI is green.
One minor comment is that we probably need to ensure that preview estimators don't make it to comparison plot with sklearn that is meant for publishing but that is out of scope for this PR, we can fix it when producing the picture next time

[david-cortes-intel]

If they are now in preview, wouldn't it make more sense to remove them from the regular configs?

[david-cortes-intel]

Please merge main and rebase.

[ethanglaser]

If they are now in preview, wouldn't it make more sense to remove them from the regular configs?

Sure, looks like there are no preview algos in regular/ so this could be a good resolution that works for both private and public CI