Skip to content

Add CodeQL badge to README#31

Merged
HackingRepo merged 1 commit intomainfrom
HackingRepo-patch-2
Feb 10, 2026
Merged

Add CodeQL badge to README#31
HackingRepo merged 1 commit intomainfrom
HackingRepo-patch-2

Conversation

@HackingRepo
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

Review Summary by Qodo

Add CodeQL badge to README

📝 Documentation

Grey Divider

Walkthroughs

Description
• Add CodeQL badge to README for code quality visibility
Diagram
flowchart LR
  README["README.md"] -- "adds CodeQL badge link" --> BADGE["CodeQL workflow badge"]
Loading

Grey Divider

File Changes

1. README.md 📝 Documentation +1/-0

Add CodeQL workflow badge to README

• Added CodeQL badge link to the badges section
• Badge links to the GitHub CodeQL workflow action
• Positioned after Contributors badge for consistency

README.md


Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@qodo-free-for-open-source-projects

Review Summary by Qodo

Add CodeQL badge to README

📝 Documentation

Grey Divider

Walkthroughs

Description
• Add CodeQL badge to README for code quality visibility
Diagram
flowchart LR
  README["README.md"] -- "add CodeQL badge link" --> BADGE["CodeQL workflow badge"]
Loading

Grey Divider

File Changes

1. README.md 📝 Documentation +1/-0

Add CodeQL workflow badge to README

• Added CodeQL badge link to the badges section
• Badge links to the CodeQL workflow in GitHub Actions
• Positioned after Contributors badge in the README

README.md


Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@HackingRepo HackingRepo merged commit 5e9d01b into main Feb 10, 2026
12 of 14 checks passed
@HackingRepo HackingRepo deleted the HackingRepo-patch-2 branch February 10, 2026 13:07
@qodo-free-for-open-source-projects

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (1) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Grey Divider


Remediation recommended

1. Broken CodeQL badge 🐞 Bug ✧ Quality
Description
The newly added CodeQL badge points to an incorrect GitHub Actions workflow URL
(.../github-code-scanning/codeql/...) instead of the actual workflow file path, so the badge and
link will likely be broken (404). This reduces visibility into CodeQL scanning status.
Code

README.md[16]

+[![CodeQL](https://github.com/HackingRepo/dssrf-js/actions/workflows/github-code-scanning/codeql/badge.svg)](https://github.com/HackingRepo/dssrf-js/actions/workflows/github-code-scanning/codeql)
Evidence
README adds a CodeQL badge URL that does not match the repository’s existing workflow filename. The
repo contains the CodeQL workflow at .github/workflows/codeql.yml, so the badge should reference
/actions/workflows/codeql.yml/badge.svg (and link to /actions/workflows/codeql.yml).

README.md[13-18]
.github/workflows/codeql.yml[1-9]

Agent prompt
The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

### Issue description
The README CodeQL badge uses a workflow URL path that doesn’t correspond to the repo’s workflow filename, causing a broken badge/link.

### Issue Context
The repository’s CodeQL workflow is defined in `.github/workflows/codeql.yml`, but the badge references `actions/workflows/github-code-scanning/codeql/...`.

### Fix Focus Areas
- README.md[13-16]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools


Grey Divider

ⓘ The new review experience is currently in Beta. Learn more

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Contributor

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 37 untouched benchmarks


Comparing HackingRepo-patch-2 (80c00fc) with main (054df16)

Open in CodSpeed

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

Persistent review updated to latest commit 80c00fc

@codacy-production
Copy link

Codacy's Analysis Summary

0 new issue (≤ 0 issue)
0 new security issue

Review Pull Request in Codacy →

AI Reviewer available: add the codacy-review label to get contextual insights without leaving GitHub.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant