Skip to content

chore: bump hawk-core-contracts/hawk-mcpkit to v0.1.4#23

Merged
Patel230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/bump-shared-contracts-pins
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

chore: bump hawk-core-contracts/hawk-mcpkit to v0.1.4#23
Patel230 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/bump-shared-contracts-pins

Conversation

@Patel230

@Patel230 Patel230 commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Same rationale as the companion inspect PR: hawk's own go.mod already requires hawk-core-contracts@v0.1.4, so that's what actually ships in hawk's build regardless of what sight declares. sight's own CI never exercised it.

(Correction from an earlier draft: hawk-mcpkit does not currently enter hawk's build graph at all — hawk only imports the top-level sight/inspect packages, never their mcp subpackages, so mcpkit never appears in hawk's go.sum. Bumping it here is still good hygiene, just not closing a hawk-build-graph gap the way hawk-core-contracts is.)

Verified non-breaking: only imports types/review from hawk-core-contracts and Server/New/StrArg/JSONResult from hawk-mcpkit — none of which changed between these versions.

Test plan

  • go build ./... && go test ./... green locally
  • Hosted CI green on this PR

Same rationale as the companion inspect PR: hawk's own go.mod already
requires hawk-core-contracts v0.1.4 and hawk-mcpkit v0.1.4, so these
are the versions that actually ship in hawk's build regardless of what
sight declares here. sight's own CI never exercised them. Verified
both bumps are non-breaking for sight's usage (only imports
types/review from hawk-core-contracts and Server/New/StrArg/JSONResult
from hawk-mcpkit — none of which changed between these versions).
@Patel230 Patel230 merged commit 754e245 into main Jul 13, 2026
12 checks passed
@Patel230 Patel230 deleted the chore/bump-shared-contracts-pins branch July 13, 2026 23:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant