Skip to content

Conversation

@gurusai-voleti
Copy link

Automated: Migrate {target_path} from gsutil to gcloud storage

This CL is part of the on going effort to migrate from the legacy gsutil tool to the new and improved gcloud storage command-line interface.
gcloud storage is the recommended and modern tool for interacting with Google Cloud Storage, offering better performance, unified authentication, and a more consistent command structure with other gcloud components. 🚀

Automation Details

This change was generated automatically by an agent that targets users of gsutil.
The transformations applied are based on the gsutil to gcloud storage migration guide.

⚠️ Action Required: Please Review and Test Carefully

While we have based the automation on the migration guide, every use case is unique.
It is crucial that you thoroughly test these changes in environments appropriate to your use-case before merging.
Be aware of potential differences between gsutil and gcloud storage that could impact your workflows.
For instance, the structure of command output may have changed, requiring updates to any scripts that parse it. Similarly, command behavior can differ subtly; the gcloud storage rsync command has a different file deletion logic than gsutil rsync, which could lead to unintended file deletions.

Our migration guides can help guide you through a list of mappings and some notable differences between the two tools.

Standard presubmit tests are run as part of this CL's workflow. If you need to target an additional test workflow or require assistance with testing, please let us know.

Please verify that all your Cloud Storage operations continue to work as expected to avoid any potential disruptions in production.

Support and Collaboration

The GCS CLI team is here to help! If you encounter any issues, have a complex use case that this automated change doesn't cover, or face any other blockers, please don't hesitate to reach out.
We are happy to work with you to test and adjust these changes as needed.

Contact: gcs-cli-hyd@google.com

We appreciate your partnership in this important migration effort!

#gsutil-migration

@gurusai-voleti gurusai-voleti requested review from a team as code owners January 8, 2026 12:33
@gurusai-voleti
Copy link
Author

Hi @franziska.hinkelmann, Can we get your review on this PR? Thanks!

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added samples Issues that are directly related to samples. api: cloudfunctions Issues related to the Cloud Run functions API. asset: pattern DEE Asset tagging - Pattern. labels Jan 8, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @gurusai-voleti, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the documentation for the imagemagick Cloud Functions examples to use the modern gcloud storage command-line interface instead of the legacy gsutil tool. This change is part of an automated, ongoing effort to standardize Cloud Storage interactions, aiming for better performance, unified authentication, and a more consistent command structure across Google Cloud services.

Highlights

  • gsutil to gcloud storage Migration: This pull request automates the migration of gsutil commands to gcloud storage commands, aligning with Google Cloud's recommended practices for interacting with Cloud Storage.
  • Documentation Updates: The README.md files for functions/imagemagick and functions/v2/imagemagick have been updated to reflect the new gcloud storage buckets create command for creating Cloud Storage buckets, replacing the deprecated gsutil mb.
  • Automated Change & Review Requirement: This change was automatically generated as part of a larger migration effort. Reviewers are urged to carefully test the changes due to potential subtle differences in command behavior between gsutil and gcloud storage.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request automates the migration from gsutil to gcloud storage commands in README files. The changes are correct, but I've suggested an improvement. For better performance and cost-efficiency, it's a best practice to create storage buckets in the same location as the Cloud Function. I've added comments suggesting the use of the --location flag to the gcloud storage buckets create commands in both updated README files.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: cloudfunctions Issues related to the Cloud Run functions API. asset: pattern DEE Asset tagging - Pattern. samples Issues that are directly related to samples.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant