Fix select all checkbox alignment #82099

jmusial · 2026-02-11T10:29:51Z

Explanation of Change

A follow up for #81527, fixes checkbox alignment on other pages.

Fixed Issues

$ #80133
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Go to Worspace members page, verify that select all checkbox is aligned with item checkboxes
Repeat for other pages ex. Workspace Categories and Workspace tags

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
- I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
- I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
- I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  - If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
- The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
- The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2026-02-11.at.11.27.47.mov

melvin-bot · 2026-02-11T10:35:32Z

@situchan Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

codecov · 2026-02-11T10:36:53Z

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...omponents/SelectionList/ListItem/TableListItem.tsx	`100.00% <ø> (ø)`
src/components/SelectionListWithModal/index.tsx	`90.90% <100.00%> (+0.90%)`	⬆️
src/pages/ReportParticipantsPage.tsx	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
src/pages/RoomMembersPage.tsx	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
src/pages/domain/BaseDomainMembersPage.tsx	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
src/pages/settings/Rules/ExpenseRulesPage.tsx	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
src/pages/workspace/WorkspaceMembersPage.tsx	`61.07% <100.00%> (ø)`
...s/workspace/categories/WorkspaceCategoriesPage.tsx	`60.07% <ø> (ø)`
...orkspace/distanceRates/PolicyDistanceRatesPage.tsx	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
...c/pages/workspace/perDiem/WorkspacePerDiemPage.tsx	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
... and 5 more
... and 131 files with indirect coverage changes

github-actions · 2026-02-11T10:37:21Z

src/styles/index.ts

            backgroundColor: theme.componentBG,
        },

+        baseListHeaderWrapperStyle: {


❌ CONSISTENCY-2 (docs)

The hardcoded pixel values (40, 12, 20) are magic numbers without clear documentation of their purpose or relationship to the design system.

Suggested fix: Reference existing spacing constants from the theme or add comments explaining these specific values:

baseListHeaderWrapperStyle: { // Horizontal padding to align checkbox header with content paddingHorizontal: 40, paddingVertical: 12, paddingBottom: 20, },

Or better yet, if these values correspond to existing spacing utilities:

baseListHeaderWrapperStyle: { paddingHorizontal: spacing.large, // or reference to existing ph9/ph10 values paddingVertical: spacing.small, paddingBottom: spacing.medium, },

Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

src/components/SelectionListWithModal/index.tsx

situchan · 2026-02-11T10:38:14Z

src/styles/index.ts

        },

+        baseListHeaderWrapperStyle: {
+            paddingHorizontal: 40,


styles.ph9 (36) was original value for long time. Do you have idea which PR recently caused regression?

I found offending PR #79296

situchan · 2026-02-11T11:05:05Z

Before #81620: (16px margin)

After #81620: (20px margin)

@Expensify/design which one is correct?

Here's video for easy compare:

Screen.Recording.2026-02-11.at.5.05.34.PM.mov

shawnborton · 2026-02-11T11:13:42Z

It seems like the Before is more correct?

jmusial · 2026-02-11T11:23:58Z

OK @situchan do you think we should change the negative margin on ListItems checkbox intead or increasing it for header ?

situchan · 2026-02-11T11:25:40Z

OK @situchan do you think we should change the negative margin on ListItems checkbox intead or increasing it for header ?

I think so. We should not touch header.

jmusial · 2026-02-11T14:20:29Z

@situchan updated, left the refactor with default styles for listHeaderWrapperStyle as it was repeated in all the components using SelectionListWithModal

situchan · 2026-02-11T15:12:00Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: HybridApp
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: HybridApp
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: HybridApp

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

situchan · 2026-02-11T15:16:15Z

This should also be aligned:

shawnborton · 2026-02-11T16:44:38Z

Sorry just to make sure I am following - can we just go back to the styles we always had for tables?

Just want to make sure we aren't changing everything. Can we confirm that table rows will keep their current 16px padding, with 12px gap?

situchan · 2026-02-11T17:49:53Z

can we just go back to the styles we always had for tables?

yes, confirmed. This PR is technically fixing regression from #79296 which increased 4px padding horizontally.

shawnborton · 2026-02-11T17:52:30Z

Sounds great, thanks for confirming 👍

OSBotify · 2026-02-11T19:16:54Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify · 2026-02-12T15:49:52Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.18-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

fix checkbox alinment

90a835f

melvin-bot bot assigned jmusial Feb 11, 2026

jmusial mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2026

[Release 3.6] [Domain Control] Bulk close members' accounts #81527

Merged

51 tasks

jmusial marked this pull request as ready for review February 11, 2026 10:35

jmusial requested review from a team as code owners February 11, 2026 10:35

melvin-bot bot requested review from situchan and trjExpensify and removed request for a team February 11, 2026 10:35

melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team February 11, 2026 10:35

github-actions bot reviewed Feb 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

src/components/SelectionListWithModal/index.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved

situchan reviewed Feb 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

update styles

bd924dd

jmusial added 2 commits February 11, 2026 15:16

update so the change is for list item, not header

5953ad7

Domain Members Page update

b38b1b4

update margin so that item title is aligned as well

5a82679

situchan approved these changes Feb 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny February 11, 2026 16:44

mountiny approved these changes Feb 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

mountiny merged commit ad85f37 into Expensify:main Feb 11, 2026
30 checks passed

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2026

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2026-02-12 #82262

Open

Fix select all checkbox alignment #82099

Fix select all checkbox alignment #82099

Uh oh!

Conversation

jmusial commented Feb 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 11, 2026

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2026 • edited by github-actions bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

github-actions bot Feb 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

❌ CONSISTENCY-2 (docs)

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

situchan Feb 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

situchan Feb 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

situchan commented Feb 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

shawnborton commented Feb 11, 2026

Uh oh!

jmusial commented Feb 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

situchan commented Feb 11, 2026

Uh oh!

jmusial commented Feb 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

situchan commented Feb 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

situchan commented Feb 11, 2026

Uh oh!

shawnborton commented Feb 11, 2026

Uh oh!

situchan commented Feb 11, 2026

Uh oh!

shawnborton commented Feb 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Feb 11, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Feb 12, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

jmusial commented Feb 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2026 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

situchan commented Feb 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

jmusial commented Feb 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

jmusial commented Feb 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

situchan commented Feb 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading