Skip to content

test argocd submission#23834

Draft
steveny91 wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
sy/argocd-genresources-pilot
Draft

test argocd submission#23834
steveny91 wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
sy/argocd-genresources-pilot

Conversation

@steveny91
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add qa/required if this PR needs QA validation, or qa/skip-qa if it does not. Exactly one of the two is required.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot commented May 26, 2026

Pipelines

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 6 Pipeline jobs failed

PR | test / test (linux, ubuntu-22.04, argocd, ArgoCD (py3.13-2.4.7), py3.13-2.4.7) / ArgoCD (py3.13-2.4.7)-py3.13-2.4.7   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

🔧 Fix in code (Fix with Cursor). Linting failed due to formatting issues. 1 file needs reformatting, run 'ddev test --fmt argocd' to fix.

PR | test / test-minimum-base-package (linux, ubuntu-22.04, argocd, ArgoCD (py3.13-2.4.7), py3.13-2.4.7) / minimum-base-package-ArgoCD (py3.13-2.4.7)-py3.13-2.4.7   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

🔧 Fix in code (Fix with Cursor). Linting failed. Please run 'ddev test --fmt argocd' to fix formatting issues.

Check PR | run / Check PR changelog   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

🛟 This job is unlikely to succeed on retry. Please review your pipeline configuration. Release note not found for package 'argocd' during changelog validation. Please run `ddev release changelog new` to add it.

View all 6 failed jobs.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: e847fca | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 26, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 92.07317% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 89.05%. Comparing base (73276c7) to head (04b4f3a).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 26, 2026

Validation Report

Validation Description Status
license-headers Validate Python files have proper license headers
metadata Validate metadata.csv metric definitions
models Validate configuration data models match spec.yaml
qa-label Validate the pull request declares whether it needs QA for the next Agent release

Run ddev validate all changed --fix to attempt to auto-fix supported validations.

Passed validations (17)
Validation Description Status
agent-reqs Verify check versions match the Agent requirements file
ci Validate CI configuration and Codecov settings
codeowners Validate every integration has a CODEOWNERS entry
config Validate default configuration files against spec.yaml
dep Verify dependency pins are consistent and Agent-compatible
http Validate integrations use the HTTP wrapper correctly
imports Validate check imports do not use deprecated modules
integration-style Validate check code style conventions
jmx-metrics Validate JMX metrics definition files and config
labeler Validate PR labeler config matches integration directories
legacy-signature Validate no integration uses the legacy Agent check signature
licenses Validate third-party license attribution list
openmetrics Validate OpenMetrics integrations disable the metric limit
package Validate Python package metadata and naming
readmes Validate README files have required sections
saved-views Validate saved view JSON file structure and fields
version Validate version consistency between package and changelog

View full run

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant