Skip to content

[DOCS-13132] Clarify Google Cloud metric ingestion latency#36313

Open
buraizu wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
docs13132/gcp-latency-clarification
Open

[DOCS-13132] Clarify Google Cloud metric ingestion latency#36313
buraizu wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
docs13132/gcp-latency-clarification

Conversation

@buraizu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@buraizu buraizu commented Apr 27, 2026

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Fixes DOCS-13132

Clarifies the Google Cloud metric ingestion latency in two places to deflect "why am I waiting" support tickets analyzed under DOCS-13132. The existing "Metrics appear in Datadog approximately 15 minutes after setup" wording conflated initial-setup latency (time before the first metric arrives after configuring the integration) with steady-state latency (ongoing delay between Google Cloud emitting a metric and it appearing in Datadog).

Changes:

  • content/en/getting_started/integrations/google_cloud.md: distinguishes the ~15-minute initial-setup latency from the ~7-8-minute steady-state delay, with a reference link to the existing Cloud Metric Delay guide for the full breakdown.
  • content/en/integrations/guide/gcp-metric-discrepancy.md: adds a new ## Latency section before ## Further reading, covering the same two numbers plus a "wait at least 10-15 minutes before assuming a metric is missing" troubleshooting guard.

The 7-8 minute number is sourced from the existing cloud-metric-delay guide, which has been the canonical Datadog-wide cloud latency reference. This PR surfaces that data point in the GCP-specific docs where customers actually search.

A companion change in integrations-internal-core applies the same disambiguation to the integration tile page (google_cloud_platform/README.md); that PR will be opened after this one merges.

Follow-up work tracked in DOCS-14214: log latency, billing latency, and backfill behavior across pipelines (SME-blocked).

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

Additional notes

@buraizu buraizu requested a review from a team as a code owner April 27, 2026 19:46
@buraizu buraizu added the WORK IN PROGRESS No review needed, it's a wip ;) label Apr 27, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Guide Content impacting a guide label Apr 27, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Guide Content impacting a guide WORK IN PROGRESS No review needed, it's a wip ;)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant