Skip to content

Conversation

@DeadPixelPro
Copy link
Contributor

@DeadPixelPro DeadPixelPro commented Feb 2, 2026

Check one:

  • Semantic Change: something about the meaning of the text is different
  • Non-semantic Change: Spelling, grammar, or formatting changes.

Summary of change(s):

  • Changed it so that On-Floor Frosh weren't excluded from required signatures, as Off-Floor Frosh weren't excluded.
  • Made it so all active Frosh count for the required signatures (This part is certainly going to be a discussion)

Removed "excluding those of On-Floor Members who have not passed a Membership Eval" from the required signatures.
This might actually not be needed but idk this is a tomorrow problem.
@DeadPixelPro
Copy link
Contributor Author

(The first part was found by Rob. The second part is a change we're discussing)

@DeadPixelPro DeadPixelPro changed the title Oops, On-floor Frosh are excluded from signatures, but not off-floor? Allow active frosh to count to packet percentage. Feb 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant