-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 398
Cape Town| 26-ITP-May|Enice Mutanda| Sprint 3 |Implement-And-Rewrite Tests #1517
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Enice-Codes
wants to merge
5
commits into
CodeYourFuture:main
Choose a base branch
from
Enice-Codes:coursework/sprint-3-implement-and-rewrite
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a847980
Complete Sprint 3 implement-and-rewrite exercises
534fa29
reviewed proper fraction
fcea904
made sure all the output of the function follow the same alphabet casing
57f15f8
implemented correct code
7c0d8f5
complete implement and rewrite tests exercises
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
41 changes: 27 additions & 14 deletions
41
Sprint-3/1-implement-and-rewrite-tests/rewrite-tests-with-jest/1-get-angle-type.test.js
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,20 +1,33 @@ | ||
| // This statement loads the getAngleType function you wrote in the implement directory. | ||
| // We will use the same function, but write tests for it using Jest in this file. | ||
| const getAngleType = require("../implement/1-get-angle-type"); | ||
|
|
||
| // TODO: Write tests in Jest syntax to cover all cases/outcomes, | ||
| // including boundary and invalid cases. | ||
| test("returns acute angle for angles between 0 and 90", () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(1)).toEqual("acute angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(45)).toEqual("acute angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(89)).toEqual("acute angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("returns right angle for 90 degrees", () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(90)).toEqual("right angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("returns obtuse angle for angles between 90 and 180", () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(91)).toEqual("obtuse angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(125)).toEqual("obtuse angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(172)).toEqual("obtuse angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("returns straight angle for 180 degrees", () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(180)).toEqual("straight angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 1: Acute angles | ||
| test(`should return "Acute angle" when (0 < angle < 90)`, () => { | ||
| // Test various acute angles, including boundary cases | ||
| expect(getAngleType(1)).toEqual("Acute angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(45)).toEqual("Acute angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(89)).toEqual("Acute angle"); | ||
| test("returns reflex angle for angles between 180 and 360", () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(181)).toEqual("reflex angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(270)).toEqual("reflex angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(359)).toEqual("reflex angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 2: Right angle | ||
| // Case 3: Obtuse angles | ||
| // Case 4: Straight angle | ||
| // Case 5: Reflex angles | ||
| // Case 6: Invalid angles | ||
| test("returns invalid angle for angles outside the valid range", () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(-1)).toEqual("invalid angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(361)).toEqual("invalid angle"); | ||
| }); |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it possible to simplify this else if statement using Comparison Operators?