Skip to content

Add delivery pipeline and ceplugin template - #5

Closed
AriusII wants to merge 0 commit into
client-hosting-and-difrom
delivery-quality-and-template
Closed

AriusII wants to merge 0 commit into
client-hosting-and-difrom
delivery-quality-and-template

Conversation

@AriusII

@AriusII AriusII commented Sep 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Context

This is the delivery PR at the top of the CheatEngine.Client v0.1 stacked implementation.

Why this exists

After contracts, Core, Fluent, and Hosting/DI are available, the repository needs a reproducible delivery path that proves package consumption, template generation, AOT compatibility, and the intended architecture to contributors.

What changed

  • Replaces the legacy CheatEngine.Client.Binding projects with the final Core project layout in the solution.
  • Adds the CheatEngine.Client.Templates package and the ceplugin template as the canonical executable example.
  • Adds package-consumption and template-installation smoke scripts, including the negative CECLIENT001 case.
  • Adds a win-x64 Native AOT probe for the complete managed Client graph; it does not claim a Cheat Engine Native AOT plugin is loadable.
  • Reworks GitHub Actions into reusable CI plus explicit main and pull-request entry workflows.
  • Rewrites the repository README and records architecture, lifecycle, package/AOT, and capability decisions in ADRs.

Template policy

Generated plugins reference both CheatEngine.Client and CheatEngine.SDK directly, configure optional appsettings.json explicitly with no file watcher, and use explicit Client modules rather than reflection or a Generic Host.

Validation

Solution build:        0 warnings, 0 errors
Solution tests:        Passed 207, Failed 0, Skipped 0
Package smoke:         passed (including CECLIENT001 negative case)
Template smoke:        passed (install, dry-run, instantiate, restore, Release build)
Native AOT probe:      publish and execution passed for win-x64

Dependency

Base branch: client-hosting-and-di / #4. Merge after #4, then retarget the stacked PRs as their predecessors merge.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: c2e1b35c-895f-4304-92f4-7c3ffed6e6db

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AriusII
AriusII force-pushed the client-hosting-and-di branch from d13e201 to eee9be3 Compare September 20, 2026 17:16
@AriusII
AriusII force-pushed the delivery-quality-and-template branch from 1035fad to 7d4a6fc Compare September 20, 2026 17:16
@AriusII
AriusII force-pushed the client-hosting-and-di branch from eee9be3 to b4f0f97 Compare September 20, 2026 18:35
@AriusII
AriusII force-pushed the delivery-quality-and-template branch 2 times, most recently from 17ded2d to 792a361 Compare September 20, 2026 18:44
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@AriusII
AriusII force-pushed the client-hosting-and-di branch from b4f0f97 to da651d1 Compare September 20, 2026 18:51
@AriusII AriusII closed this Sep 20, 2026
@AriusII
AriusII force-pushed the delivery-quality-and-template branch from 792a361 to da651d1 Compare September 20, 2026 18:51
@AriusII

AriusII commented Sep 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
⚠️ Action not completed

Pull request is closed.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant