Skip to content

Clarify historical Testnet status and current project documentation - #4

Merged
xrpbanks merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/historical-prototype-current-links
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

xrpbanks merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/historical-prototype-current-links

Conversation

@xrpbanks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Readers could mistake this older prototype and its README claims for the current CalorieApp.

This AI-assisted documentation-only change directs visitors to the current food app and publications, clarifies the historical/non-Mainnet scope, and preserves the previous README verbatim in a labelled archive. Runtime code and licence files remain untouched; existing rights are preserved. The current Testnet guide does not automatically create an app identity or pilot role, and there is no active community voting programme.

Validation: current-source references and archived README bytes checked. The owner authorised repository documentation updates, Copilot review and merge after relevant checks. No current app deployment or financial service is certified.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 10, 2026 13:58
@github-advanced-security

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool.

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

  • The 'Security' tab will display more code scanning analysis results (e.g., for the default branch).
  • Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results.
  • You will be able to see the analysis results for the pull request's branch on this overview once the scans have completed and the checks have passed.

For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The changes are documentation-only and low risk, with only minor consistency/usability nits noted in review comments.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the repository’s documentation to clearly position it as a historical XRPL Testnet prototype archive, and to direct readers to the current CalorieApp V2 webapp, source repository, and publications—without changing runtime code or licensing files.

Changes:

  • Replaces the root README with a short “Testnet archive” overview that links to current app resources and clarifies non-production/non-Mainnet scope.
  • Updates regulatory boundary and documentation index pages to consistently describe the separation from CalorieApp V2 and remove “getting started” style operational framing.
  • Adds a dated, archived copy of the previous README for historical reference.
File summaries
File Description
README.md Reframes the repo as a historical Testnet archive and points readers to current app/publications.
docs/REGULATORY_BOUNDARY.md Updates “Last updated” date and aligns wording to CalorieApp V2 separation.
docs/README.md Rewrites the docs index intro to emphasize historical reference context and points to the reading guide/archive.
docs/OFFICIAL_PROJECT_DOCS.md Converts the “official docs” page into a reading guide for the historical prototype with current pointers.
docs/archive/README-before-2026-09-10.md Adds an archived copy of the previous README content for reference.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 5/5 changed files
  • Comments generated: 3
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread README.md
Comment thread README.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/README.md
@xrpbanks
xrpbanks merged commit 75c38a3 into main Sep 10, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants