-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Fix NN search #644
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Whyborn
wants to merge
4
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
643-fix-NN-search
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Fix NN search #644
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure on the choice of 144. here - this need to be larger (in degrees^2) than the expected largest gridcell. 144 here corresponds to a 12 degree-squared cell (so 30x15 cells in a global simulation) - so coarse but as coarse as it could be
I would have thought that 64800 would have been the safest option for this initialisation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea, my only reason for choosing this value is that it's what was chosen in the
CABLE-POP_TRENDYbranch- effectively saying if you can't find any valid source data within a 12 degree circle, crash out. Is this something desired? Or should it be if it finds a valid neighbour anywhere on the globe, then that's ok?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
okay - that makes some sense. In effect it's trying to say if there isn't a valid lat/lon within the 12-degree circle then you need to fix your gridinfo - we could encouter this type of thing in high resolution simulations where we get some new land appearing (think Pacific/southern ocean islands).
Probably just needs a comment to explain the choice of 144
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment has been added
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be clear, I don't know what the best behaviour should be here. I'll try to raise this with people using the
mainbranch of CABLE for offline simulations and get their opinions before merging this.