Skip to content

.which property #123

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
nathanmacinnes wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

.which property #123

nathanmacinnes wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@nathanmacinnes
Copy link
Contributor

@nathanmacinnes nathanmacinnes commented Nov 3, 2014

This is something I'll find very useful. I've tried to make the tests illustrate the benefit, but in a bit more detail:

expect(fooBar).to.have.property("foo").which.is.an("object")
  .and.has.property("bar").which.is.a("function");

and this is the equivalent without .which:

expect(fooBar).to.have.property("foo");
expect(fooBar.foo).to.be.an("object")
  .and.to.have.property("bar");
expect(fooBar.foo.bar).to.be.a("function");

@nathanmacinnes
Added .which property to .has.own.property() tests
d8694a1 
This allows the user to test properties more elegantly.

````
expect(myArray).to.have.property(0)
    .which.is.a(Foo)
    .and.has.own.property("bar");
````
@nathanmacinnes
Updated docs to include .which property
7decbed
@nathanmacinnes nathanmacinnes mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2014
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@nathanmacinnes