Skip to content

fix:config.tomlの問題でCodexが起動不可になっていたのを修正 - #4283

Merged
KATO-Hiro merged 1 commit into
stagingfrom
fix/codex-config
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

KATO-Hiro merged 1 commit into
stagingfrom
fix/codex-config

Conversation

@river0525

@river0525 river0525 commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 設定
    • アクセス拒否の対象を .codex ディレクトリ全体から、認証情報ファイルに限定しました。

@river0525
river0525 requested review from KATO-Hiro and a balanced review from Copilot and removed request for Copilot November 2, 2026 12:51
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info
Run configuration
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c8399f8 and 4b89385.

Files selected for processing: 1
  • .codex/config.toml

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

Walkthrough

.codex/config.tomlの拒否設定を変更しました。~/.codex全体ではなく、~/.codex/auth.jsonを拒否対象に指定します。

Changes: Codex設定

Layer / File(s) Summary
拒否対象パスの変更
.codex/config.toml
拒否対象を~/.codex全体から~/.codex/auth.jsonに変更しました。

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Bug fix

Suggested reviewers: kato-hiro

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 4b893

The change narrows the deny rule from the whole ~/.codex directory to ~/.codex/auth.json so Codex can start while still protecting the credentials file in the supported setup. No blocking risk was found.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 5
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check Passed タイトルは、config.toml の問題を修正し、Codexが起動できない問題を解決する変更内容を正確に示しています。
Docstring Coverage Passed No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

Finishing Touches
Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@river0525
river0525 requested a balanced review from Copilot November 2, 2026 12:51

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota. Try requesting a review at a lower effort level.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing.

@KATO-Hiro KATO-Hiro left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

修正していただき、ありがとうございます
LGTMです

マージします

@KATO-Hiro
KATO-Hiro merged commit 34e712c into staging Nov 2, 2026
6 checks passed
@KATO-Hiro
KATO-Hiro deleted the fix/codex-config branch November 2, 2026 12:55

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
preview — 4b89385f Deployed Nov 2, 2026 by river0525 via preview #9205
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants