Skip to content

Add Rubick - #8833

Open
probonopd wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
discover/Rubick
Open

probonopd wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
discover/Rubick

Conversation

@probonopd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Repository: https://github.com/Dudude-bit/rubick

Modern cross-platform Kubernetes GUI client built with Tauri and Rust

  • Stars: 118
  • Release with the AppImage: v4.21.0 (2026-09-29T17:36:01Z)
  • AppImage asset: Rubick_4.21.0_amd64.AppImage
  • License: GPL-3.0

Found by .github/workflows/discover-apps.yml, which looks for GitHub
repositories that publish AppImages but are not in the catalog yet. This
entry was not tested by a human; please review it before merging.

Discovered on GitHub as publishing AppImages on its releases, by
discover-apps.yml. Needs a maintainer's review.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added error-app-exits Test failed: the application quit or crashed right after starting error-not-executable Test failed: a file inside the AppImage is not executable labels Sep 30, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

❌ Test failure

@Dudude-bit: this pull request adds the AppImage from your GitHub repository to the AppImage catalog; the test reports the following. Could you have a look?

Compatibility: not self-contained: uses the C library of the system; references glibc 2.39

  • A file inside the AppImage is not executable. Please check the file permissions before packaging the AppImage.
  • The application quit or crashed right after starting. The error below usually shows why.

First error in the log:

/run/firejail/appimage/AppRun: line 12: /run/firejail/appimage/AppRun.wrapped: Permission denied

The application showed no window, but may be a system tray application (usr/lib/girepository-1.0/Gtk-3.0.typelib: gtk_status_icon_new); running it again with a system tray
/run/firejail/appimage/AppRun: line 12: /run/firejail/appimage/AppRun.wrapped: Permission denied
No icon appeared in the system tray either
ERROR: The application exited within 11 seconds instead of showing a window

What next: once the AppImage is fixed (e.g. in a new release), comment /retest here to test it again. If it should not be in the catalog after all, close this pull request; an app that is already in the catalog can be removed by a maintainer with /remove.

Commit 9eca222. Full log

@Dudude-bit

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest

4.21.1 fixes it: the launcher inside the AppImage (AppRun.wrapped) was stored as 0770, so a user other than the mount's owner could not start it (tauri-apps/tauri#16155).

@probonopd probonopd closed this Sep 30, 2026
@probonopd probonopd reopened this Sep 30, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added error-glibc-too-new Test failed: built on a too new system (needs a newer glibc) and removed error-not-executable Test failed: a file inside the AppImage is not executable labels Sep 30, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

❌ Test failure

Compatibility: not self-contained: uses the C library of the system; references glibc 2.39

  • The AppImage was built on a system that is too new. Please build it on the oldest still-supported Ubuntu LTS release so that it runs on all supported systems.
  • The application quit or crashed right after starting. The error below usually shows why.

First error in the log:

Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.39' not found (required by Rubick)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libgdk-3.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libgdk-3.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libcairo.so.2)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libcairo.so.2)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libwebkit2gtk-4.1.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libwebkit2gtk-4.1.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libgtk-3.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libgtk-3.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libsoup-3.0.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libjavascriptcoregtk-4.1.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libjavascriptcoregtk-4.1.so.0)
Rubick: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.38' not found (required by /run/firejail/appimage/usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0)

What next: once the AppImage is fixed (e.g. in a new release), comment /retest here to test it again. If it should not be in the catalog after all, close this pull request; an app that is already in the catalog can be removed by a maintainer with /remove.

Commit 9eca222. Full log

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

auto-discovered error-app-exits Test failed: the application quit or crashed right after starting error-glibc-too-new Test failed: built on a too new system (needs a newer glibc)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants