Skip to content

build: added old WIP Dockerfile and dockerignore #776

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
ErikBjare wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

build: added old WIP Dockerfile and dockerignore #776

ErikBjare wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@ErikBjare
Copy link
Member

@ErikBjare ErikBjare commented Aug 30, 2022

Probably doesn't work, not sure if there's any use for it, just wanted to get it out of my working tree.

@ErikBjare ErikBjare marked this pull request as draft August 30, 2022 09:29
@ErikBjare ErikBjare force-pushed the master branch 4 times, most recently from 3d1fcd1 to 7259e24 Compare August 31, 2022 12:51
@ErikBjare
Copy link
Member Author

ErikBjare commented Apr 9, 2023 •
edited
Loading

I've realized this might actually be useful to build arm64 releases, making progress on #641

@ErikBjare
Copy link
Member Author

ErikBjare commented Apr 9, 2023

Turns out pyqt6-qt6 doesn't have an arm64 wheel on PyPI (although exists in Ubuntu 22.10).

A workaround, that I've been meaning to do anyway, could be to offer a non-GUI aw-qt that exists as a CLI only (without any deps on qt). Similar to what was requested in ActivityWatch/aw-qt#84

@jlumbroso
Copy link

jlumbroso commented Jun 13, 2023

@ErikBjare

Turns out pyqt6-qt6 doesn't have an arm64 wheel on PyPI (although exists in Ubuntu 22.10).

I am confused, does this not mean that there is an arm64 wheel for PyQt6-Qt6?
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/db/63/1a6ffdc84f98e37510171b9b6c2ce9be5006fbffaa5e077f028a5a1ad755/PyQt6_Qt6-6.5.1-py3-none-macosx_11_0_arm64.whl

Screenshot 2023-06-12 at 10 28 03 PM

@ErikBjare
Copy link
Member Author

ErikBjare commented Jun 13, 2023

@jlumbroso I was referring to an arm64 Linux build.

I'm not sure if you can use the changes in this PR to make a Docker-built version of ActivityWatch for macOS under arm64, but maybe?

@ErikBjare ErikBjare force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from df13a96 to 10dfeda Compare November 22, 2023 11:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ErikBjare @jlumbroso