Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
I would assume that you anre able to use zfs-pam to replace the removed package. If not, you migrate your home directory to a form will work before you allow the removed module to be updated. Such is the nature of rolling releases. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I was wondering if that isn't an essential package if one has an encrypted home folder.
I have void installed via Project Trident and it uses encrypted home folder.
So I had to not only put that package on hold in order to not get it removed, but also rebuild it against the zfs 2.3.0 as the previous revision wouldn't work for the new zfs.
Now, I don't mind rebuilding the package myself - as long as the template still works that's an easy and quick task. But I probably wouldn't be able to "fix" the template should it stop working for future zfs versions.
But then I could just stay on the the current zfs main version.
So, not the biggest of problems, I guess - for now.
But I was wondering - how would decrypting and mounting an encrypted home folder work without this package? Especially if a graphical login is used (LightDM).
Do maybe the packages pam_mount and zfs-pam do the same as pam_zfscrypt and can be used as a replacement?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions