Is fetch handler pattern mandatory for adapters?
#39
kallebysantos
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
We initially defined the core primitives and our examples to work as
It doesn't mean that So I believe that if Tanstack supports all serveless patterns that this package aims to be, it should be okay to not strict on the default syntax. Any community member is welcome to implement an adapter, we just need to make sure it follows the best Dev Experiencie for the target framework its trying to fit. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
@wobsoriano: Will this repo only accept runtimes that expose a fetch handler, or is there appetite for framework middleware adapters that don't follow the
export default { fetch }pattern, specifically tanstack start which has middleware but noapp.fetchequivalent? — Original questionBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions