Reword principle #2 around native provider tools + integrations

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: rmdevpro

layout-tests/01-split-hero.html

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
         <p class="sub">Workbench's value proposition is based on 6 key facts:</p>
         <ol class="principles">
           <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
-          <li>Because of native integration with their models, first-party agentic tools outperform third-party tools.</li>
+          <li>Native provider agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
           <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
           <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
           <li>Models from different providers both think differently and are good at different things.</li>

layout-tests/02-image-anchor.html

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
     <p class="sub">Workbench's value proposition is based on 6 key facts:</p>
     <ol class="principles">
       <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
-      <li>Because of native integration with their models, first-party agentic tools outperform third-party tools.</li>
+      <li>Native provider agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
       <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
       <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
       <li>Models from different providers both think differently and are good at different things.</li>

layout-tests/03-editorial-alternating.html

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
     <p class="sub">Workbench's value proposition is based on 6 key facts:</p>
     <ol class="principles">
       <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
-      <li>Because of native integration with their models, first-party agentic tools outperform third-party tools.</li>
+      <li>Native provider agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
       <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
       <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
       <li>Models from different providers both think differently and are good at different things.</li>

layout-tests/04-banner-card-grid.html

@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
     <div class="heading">Workbench's value proposition is based on 6 key facts</div>
     <div class="facts-grid">
       <div class="fact"><p>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</p></div>
-      <div class="fact"><p>Because of native integration with their models, first-party agentic tools outperform third-party tools.</p></div>
+      <div class="fact"><p>Native provider agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</p></div>
       <div class="fact"><p>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</p></div>
       <div class="fact"><p>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</p></div>
       <div class="fact"><p>Models from different providers both think differently and are good at different things.</p></div>

layout-tests/05-sticky-image.html

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
     <p class="sub">Workbench's value proposition is based on 6 key facts:</p>
     <ol class="principles">
       <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
-      <li>Because of native integration with their models, first-party agentic tools outperform third-party tools.</li>
+      <li>Native provider agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
       <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
       <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
       <li>Models from different providers both think differently and are good at different things.</li>

open-source/blueprint-agentic-workbench.html

@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
     <p class="sub">Workbench's value proposition is based on 6 key facts:</p>
     <ol class="principles">
       <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
-      <li>Because of native integration with their models, first-party agentic tools outperform third-party tools.</li>
+      <li>Native provider agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
       <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
       <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
       <li>Models from different providers both think differently and are good at different things.</li>