Proposed enforcement point
runtime response-path validation
Domain
streaming and chunked integration behavior
Runtime or framework
LiteLLM Proxy / Open WebUI / other runtime-backed integrations as applicable
Why existing examples do not cover it
Current runtime coverage focuses mainly on request routing, startup/teardown, local-state handling, and non-streaming forwarded requests. The repository does not yet validate streaming or chunked response paths where runtime behavior might differ materially from the non-streaming path.
This gap should cover only integrations where streaming or chunked behavior is part of the meaningful runtime boundary. Likely checks include:
- whether the integration forwards streaming responses correctly
- whether chunked/streaming callbacks affect enforcement behavior
- whether response-shaping or local interception differs under streaming
- whether a given integration can be explicitly documented as not depending on streaming semantics
This should be tracked separately from the remaining Open WebUI loading/registration gap.
Where does this belong?
context-compiler-example-integrations
Proposed enforcement point
runtime response-path validation
Domain
streaming and chunked integration behavior
Runtime or framework
LiteLLM Proxy / Open WebUI / other runtime-backed integrations as applicable
Why existing examples do not cover it
Current runtime coverage focuses mainly on request routing, startup/teardown, local-state handling, and non-streaming forwarded requests. The repository does not yet validate streaming or chunked response paths where runtime behavior might differ materially from the non-streaming path.
This gap should cover only integrations where streaming or chunked behavior is part of the meaningful runtime boundary. Likely checks include:
This should be tracked separately from the remaining Open WebUI loading/registration gap.
Where does this belong?
context-compiler-example-integrations