[Suggestion] Experiment that uses OTP 28+ "priority" messages #15034
-
RabbitMQ series4.2.x Operating system (distribution) usedLinux How is RabbitMQ deployed?Other What would you like to suggest for a future version of RabbitMQ?main...lukebakken:rmq-rabbitmq-server:lukebakken/priority-credit-flow-messages When you run those changes with OTP 28, it'll use priority messages to control the I'll report back when I have time to test in an environment with monitoring in place. What I'm hoping to see is less memory usage if a publisher is publishing large messages and an alarm is triggered. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
|
it's great to use the newest features or Erlang/OTP. specifically for rabbit_read did you experience a long message queue? As I think it uses |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Note that Erlang 28 is not fully supported by RabbitMQ. We can tackle this as a research project, sure but |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
it's great to use the newest features or Erlang/OTP. specifically for rabbit_read did you experience a long message queue? As I think it uses
{active, once}so there should only be 1 message from the socket in the mailbox at once (there could be other messages ofc). Maybe the channel process can have a long message queue, but it does not handle conserve_resources but it does handle credit_flow messages