Skip to content

Conversation

@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor

@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 commented Nov 11, 2025

Backporting JDK-8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result. Fixes the roll implementation and adds a new test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and new test (passed). The merge conflict was just the copyright header which was updated to the newer one.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8367901 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4167/head:pull/4167
$ git checkout pull/4167

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4167
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4167/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4167

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4167

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4167.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 11, 2025

👋 Welcome back rm-gh-8! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 11, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport ced3f13f4e036513444d1fea3958be11741c2b8e 8367901: Calendar.roll(hour, 24) returns wrong result Nov 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 11, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Nov 11, 2025
Modify for JDK 17
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required label Nov 11, 2025
@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor Author

rm-gh-8 commented Nov 11, 2025

Key changes on original backport commit for compatibility:

  1. @FieldSource → @MethodSource: Changed to method source and created hours() method
  2. List.of() → Arrays.asList(): Used Arrays.asList for better compatibility
  3. .toList() → .collect(Collectors.toList()): Explicit collection instead of toList()
  4. var → explicit types: Replaced var declarations with explicit types
  5. Enhanced for loops: Used traditional for-each syntax instead of var

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant