From 1b3e00949a45134c267e8d690377ddacdadf3434 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Muenzenmeyer Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 16:25:33 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add meeting notes for Node.js Web Team on 2026-07-06 --- meetings/2026-07-06.md | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meetings/2026-07-06.md diff --git a/meetings/2026-07-06.md b/meetings/2026-07-06.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a71b03 --- /dev/null +++ b/meetings/2026-07-06.md @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +# Node.js Web Team Meeting 2026-07-06 + +## Links + +* GitHub Issue: + +## Present + +* Brian Muenzenmeyer @bmuenzenmeyer +* Matt Cowley @MattIPv4 + +### Observers/Guests + +_None._ + +## Agenda + +### Announcements + +_No announcements._ + +### Issues and Pull Requests + +Extracted from **web-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting. + +#### nodejs/nodejs.org + +* Define how partners should be ranked [#8995](https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/issues/8995) + * https://nodejs.org/en/about/partners + * Reference: https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/apps/site/public/static/partners/constants.json + * Brian could not find anything regarding historic precedence. + * Agreement from Matt that this needs to get written down. + * Do the categories equate to weights? Can some alogrithm derive this? + * Should we split `infrastructure` into perhaps 3 - distribution, build, website (in order) + * Why do we have `security` and `ESP`? https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/apps/site/types/partners.ts#L32C2-L32C3 + * Security category is missing entirely from https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/docs/partners.md + * Proposal (weights out of 10): + * (Delete) Security + * (Delete) Release + * (4) ESP + * (10) Distribution + * (6) Web site + * (8) Build + * ensure weight and logo display is driven off of the above + * How is https://nodejs.org/en/download derived? + * Some partners don't even have a category https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/apps/site/public/static/partners/constants.json#L63 + * Some partners (especially website), are missing... like Sentry, Orama, Crowdin, Chromatic, etc. + * How should we relate to https://github.com/nodejs/build#infrastructure-providers + + +#### nodejs/doc-kit + +* ci: adopt Changesets for versioning and publishing [#855](https://github.com/nodejs/doc-kit/pull/855) + * Verbal discussion: agreement that this is better than what we have today (no git tags, no GitHub Releases, no CHANGELOG.md) +* chore(monorepo): break out generators [#778](https://github.com/nodejs/doc-kit/pull/778) + * wait for other maintainer input + +#### nodejs/node + +* build, doc: move to redesign [#62045](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/62045) + * special mention of proposal to add beta docs to the website proper https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/pull/8998 + * current blocker is all page OOM + * this was removed from tsc-agenda. why? +* Render "About this documentation" as the landing page for the documentation section [#60667](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/60667) + * https://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/documentation.html is not the same as https://beta.docs.nodejs.org/documentation.html + * Concatenated stability index + +## Q&A, Other + +## Upcoming Meetings + +* **Calendar**: + +Click `Add to Google Calendar` at the bottom left to add to your own Google calendar. From c87e18e50b6567acb14d5f9083a4749885a8127a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Cowley Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 23:36:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Cleanup Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aviv Keller --- meetings/2026-07-06.md | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/meetings/2026-07-06.md b/meetings/2026-07-06.md index 0a71b03..82959f1 100644 --- a/meetings/2026-07-06.md +++ b/meetings/2026-07-06.md @@ -26,11 +26,11 @@ Extracted from **web-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests from the **nodej #### nodejs/nodejs.org * Define how partners should be ranked [#8995](https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/issues/8995) - * https://nodejs.org/en/about/partners + * https://nodejs.org/en/about/partners * Reference: https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/apps/site/public/static/partners/constants.json * Brian could not find anything regarding historic precedence. * Agreement from Matt that this needs to get written down. - * Do the categories equate to weights? Can some alogrithm derive this? + * Do the categories equate to weights? Can some algorithm derive this? * Should we split `infrastructure` into perhaps 3 - distribution, build, website (in order) * Why do we have `security` and `ESP`? https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/apps/site/types/partners.ts#L32C2-L32C3 * Security category is missing entirely from https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/docs/partners.md @@ -44,21 +44,21 @@ Extracted from **web-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests from the **nodej * ensure weight and logo display is driven off of the above * How is https://nodejs.org/en/download derived? * Some partners don't even have a category https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/apps/site/public/static/partners/constants.json#L63 - * Some partners (especially website), are missing... like Sentry, Orama, Crowdin, Chromatic, etc. + * Some partners (especially website), are missing... like Sentry, Crowdin, Chromatic, etc. * How should we relate to https://github.com/nodejs/build#infrastructure-providers #### nodejs/doc-kit * ci: adopt Changesets for versioning and publishing [#855](https://github.com/nodejs/doc-kit/pull/855) - * Verbal discussion: agreement that this is better than what we have today (no git tags, no GitHub Releases, no CHANGELOG.md) + * Verbal discussion: agreement that this is better than what we have today (no git tags, no GitHub Releases, no CHANGELOG.md) * chore(monorepo): break out generators [#778](https://github.com/nodejs/doc-kit/pull/778) - * wait for other maintainer input + * wait for other maintainer input #### nodejs/node * build, doc: move to redesign [#62045](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/62045) - * special mention of proposal to add beta docs to the website proper https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/pull/8998 + * special mention of proposal to add beta docs to the website proper https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/pull/8998 * current blocker is all page OOM * this was removed from tsc-agenda. why? * Render "About this documentation" as the landing page for the documentation section [#60667](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/60667)