suggested name: math-semantics
In the guidelines, we instruct that the <semantics> element should not be used unless specifically instructed. Since this markup is sometimes used anyway, we need a rule to check if it occurs. If it has been ordered to include it in a specific book, one can opt out of the rule when running the validator.
What the validator should flag:
The <semantics> element always occurs as the first child of the <math> element, so the validator should look for this. It is then followed by either <annotation> or <annotation-xml>. The validator should catch the following combinations:
- Occurence of
<semantics> as a first child of a <math> element
<semantics> with <annotation> as the second child<semantics> with <annotation-xml> as the second child- Occurence of
<annotation> or <annotation-xml> at all
See test file test_issue_19.epub for example expressions.
@MartheGjelstad, thoughts? (created the issue together with @AntonLMTM )
suggested name: math-semantics
In the guidelines, we instruct that the
<semantics>element should not be used unless specifically instructed. Since this markup is sometimes used anyway, we need a rule to check if it occurs. If it has been ordered to include it in a specific book, one can opt out of the rule when running the validator.What the validator should flag:
The
<semantics>element always occurs as the first child of the<math>element, so the validator should look for this. It is then followed by either<annotation>or<annotation-xml>. The validator should catch the following combinations:<semantics>as a first child of a<math>element<semantics>with<annotation>as the second child<semantics>with<annotation-xml>as the second child<annotation>or<annotation-xml>at allSee test file test_issue_19.epub for example expressions.
@MartheGjelstad, thoughts? (created the issue together with @AntonLMTM )