docs: adjust Mermaid chart styling

[nanotaboada]

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot]
198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated code block language tag and redesigned the architecture diagram with layered layout, clearer component sections, expanded connections (AutoMapper, FluentValidation, Serilog, Swashbuckle), improved styling, and a clarified main application flow.
• Chores
  • Removed bundled assets from the runtime container image; assets are no longer available at runtime.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Removed the Dockerfile COPY of assets/ into the runtime image so assets are not present at runtime; README updated with a reorganized, multi-layer Mermaid architecture diagram and added/exposed dependencies (Swashbuckle, AutoMapper, FluentValidation) and styling changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Build Configuration Dockerfile	Removed the COPY instruction that copied assets/ into the runtime image stage; all other build/COPY steps unchanged.
Documentation README.md	Replaced the Mermaid architecture diagram with a left-to-right layered diagram, added/renamed nodes and edges (including Swashbuckle, AutoMapper, FluentValidation, MemoryCache), updated classDef styling and font settings, and reworked the architecture text to describe the layered flow.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

• Verify the Dockerfile removal of assets/ is intentional and confirm no runtime dependency on those files (or adjust image/run process).
• Render-check README.md Mermaid syntax and ensure added nodes/edges accurately reflect the codebase.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title mentions adjusting Mermaid chart styling, but the changeset includes significant architectural documentation changes (expanded diagram layers, dependencies, and connections) plus unrelated changes to Dockerfile and README formatting.	Update title to reflect the full scope, such as 'docs: enhance architecture diagram with layered visualization and Dockerfile cleanup' or split into multiple PRs.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/mermaid-chart

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d330b68 and a85f9e3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• assets/images/Structure.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
• assets/images/Swagger.png is excluded by !**/*.png

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• Dockerfile (0 hunks)
• README.md (2 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• Dockerfile

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (6)

📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/Dotnet.Samples.AspNetCore.WebApi PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z
Learning: Applies to **/Services/**/*.cs : Use Service Layer for business logic encapsulation in ASP.NET Core

Applied to files:

• README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/Dotnet.Samples.AspNetCore.WebApi PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z
Learning: Applies to **/Controllers/**/*.cs : Use proper HTTP verbs (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) in ASP.NET Core controller routes

Applied to files:

• README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/Dotnet.Samples.AspNetCore.WebApi PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.cs : Use Dependency Injection for all services and repositories in ASP.NET Core

Applied to files:

• README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/Dotnet.Samples.AspNetCore.WebApi PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z
Learning: Applies to **/Repositories/**/*.cs : Apply Repository Pattern for data access abstraction in ASP.NET Core

Applied to files:

• README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/Dotnet.Samples.AspNetCore.WebApi PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z
Learning: Applies to **/Controllers/**/*.cs : Generate idiomatic ASP.NET Core controller actions with proper HTTP status codes (200, 201, 400, 404, 409, 500)

Applied to files:

• README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/Dotnet.Samples.AspNetCore.WebApi PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.cs : Use `ILogger<T>` for structured logging in ASP.NET Core

Applied to files:

• README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
• GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)

🔇 Additional comments (4)

README.md (4)

100-182: ✅ Excellent Mermaid diagram refactor with proper styling and architecture clarity.

The rewritten architecture diagram effectively represents the layered structure with clear dependencies and external integrations. Key strengths:

• Valid themeVariables: Uses only supported properties (fontFamily, textColor, lineColor, clusterBkg, clusterBorder)—no invalid "lineWidth" property
• Correct stroke styling: Properly applies stroke-width within classDef blocks rather than as a global themeVariable
• Layered representation: Subgraphs for Layer 4–6 and visual categorization (blue core, red dependencies, green tests, yellow features) clearly communicate architecture tiers
• Comprehensive connections: Both solid and dotted edges show main flow and test relationships
• Documentation integration: Line 184 caption explains the color scheme and notes that not all dependencies are shown

The diagram now aligns well with the documented architecture and best practices for Mermaid styling on GitHub.

---

61-61: Good practice: language-tagged code fence for improved rendering.

Switching from totext provides explicit language tagging for the Project Structure block, enabling better syntax highlighting in some renderers.

---

98-98: Descriptive text enhances architecture section clarity.

The added context ("Dependencies flow from data layer through repositories and services to controllers...") helps readers immediately understand the diagram's intent and layering principle.

---

1-184: Note: Dockerfile changes mentioned in PR summary not provided for review.

The AI summary references removal of assets/ COPY in the Dockerfile, but the Dockerfile is not included in the files provided for this review. Please ensure Dockerfile changes are in a separate commit or provide them for verification if runtime asset inclusion has security or deployment implications.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00%	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (079747f)	1152	196	17.01%
Head commit (a85f9e3)	1152 (+0)	196 (+0)	17.01% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#313)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 079747f and de5d32d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• assets/images/Structure.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
• assets/images/Swagger.png is excluded by !**/*.png

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• Dockerfile (0 hunks)
• README.md (1 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• Dockerfile

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (2)

📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/Dotnet.Samples.AspNetCore.WebApi PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z
Learning: Applies to **/Services/**/*.cs : Use Service Layer for business logic encapsulation in ASP.NET Core

Applied to files:

• README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: nanotaboada/Dotnet.Samples.AspNetCore.WebApi PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T18:04:01.330Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.cs : Use Dependency Injection for all services and repositories in ASP.NET Core

Applied to files:

• README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
• GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

110-172: Architecture diagram reorganization is clear and well-structured.

The restructured Mermaid diagram effectively represents the ASP.NET Core layered architecture with improved organization:

• Section comments clearly delineate logical groupings (Core Modules, External Dependencies, Supporting Features, Tests)
• Main data flow is explicit and follows expected dependency direction
• Cross-cutting concerns (Validators, Mappings) are properly integrated
• Dashed edges for test relationships provide visual distinction
• Comprehensive styling with four semantic categories (core, deps, test, feat) and consistent monospace font choice

The final descriptive note remains accurate.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud