Skip to content

Conversation

@nikolapeja6
Copy link
Member

The other labels were not being added. So, reverted to the original version of the action that worked, and added a separate step for the needs review label.

GitHub issue number

Associated Risks

Replace by possible risks this pull request can bring you might have thought of

PR Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines
  • I have read the code of conduct guidelines
  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • 👌 Code hygiene
  • 🔭 Telemetry added, updated, or N/A
  • 📄 Documentation added, updated, or N/A
  • 🛡️ Automated tests added, or N/A

🧪 How did you test it?

Replace with use cases tested and models used

@nikolapeja6 nikolapeja6 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 27, 2025 14:52
danhellem
danhellem previously approved these changes Nov 27, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

@nikolapeja6 nikolapeja6 enabled auto-merge (squash) November 27, 2025 18:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants