I have the following microflow:
with mxcli describe Test.Test_merge_boolean_codebug the result is:
create or modify microflow Test.Test_merge_boolean_codebug () returns Boolean as $output begin @position(-335, 173) @anchor(true: (to: top)) @merge(-200, 173) @caption 'true' if not(true) then @position(-335, 336) @anchor(to: top) @merge(100, 173) @caption 'true' if not(true) then @position(-50, 173) @curve(from: (30, 0), to: (-15, 0)) log info node 'NODE' 'Do something'; end if; end if; @position(200, 173) return true; end; /
When I regenerate, e.g. with a different name, the result is:
and after 'untangling':
Apart from positioning issues, this is semantically not the same as the input - false output from first split should also lead to a log activity
I have the following microflow:
with
mxcli describe Test.Test_merge_boolean_codebugthe result is:create or modify microflow Test.Test_merge_boolean_codebug () returns Boolean as $output begin @position(-335, 173) @anchor(true: (to: top)) @merge(-200, 173) @caption 'true' if not(true) then @position(-335, 336) @anchor(to: top) @merge(100, 173) @caption 'true' if not(true) then @position(-50, 173) @curve(from: (30, 0), to: (-15, 0)) log info node 'NODE' 'Do something'; end if; end if; @position(200, 173) return true; end; /When I regenerate, e.g. with a different name, the result is:
and after 'untangling':
Apart from positioning issues, this is semantically not the same as the input - false output from first split should also lead to a log activity