-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 460
Bump CAPI to v1.11.3 #5979
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump CAPI to v1.11.3 #5979
Conversation
845f0fd to
f4b28a7
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5979 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 44.72% 44.64% -0.08%
==========================================
Files 279 279
Lines 25274 25244 -30
==========================================
- Hits 11304 11271 -33
- Misses 13144 13150 +6
+ Partials 826 823 -3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Unsure about the occurring errors. The aks errors show: |
d2b0f55 to
15af32d
Compare
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-custom-builds Unrelated error: |
02667fa to
13ea58e
Compare
e092a2c to
971dd90
Compare
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-custom-builds Unrelated error (from cloud-init):
|
|
/retest |
d2ddf10 to
fc92d0d
Compare
|
/retest Gh networking issues |
fc92d0d to
5e6d68a
Compare
|
/hold To wait for kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api#13060 @mboersma , @willie-yao , @jackfrancis It would be awesome to get some opinion on this PR and also on kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api#13060 :-) |
|
cc @nojnhuh |
e8aa667 to
2a090e4
Compare
|
/retest Unrelated http request ci flake to third party data. |
|
/hold cancel |
|
/assign @mboersma @jackfrancis @willie-yao @nojnhuh |
templates/test/ci/patches/control-plane-kubeadm-boostrap-ci-version.yaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Weird, I wonder why this didn't fail before since it doesn't seem like the last commit touched it. |
nojnhuh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not a full review, just happened to notice a couple of dependency things. I may not get to looking at the rest of the changes by the time we want to merge this so don't wait for me.
Looking forward to checking this off the list!
Had to do a rebase due to #5990 |
d603a0e to
fdeff29
Compare
|
/retest |
mboersma
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This lgtm. @chrischdi do you want to squash?
I think the test failure is a flake, but we'll see.
9abed05 to
38ff448
Compare
mboersma
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
Thanks so much @chrischdi!
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: ddcdd011e0220bc8dbbdd759f9fb3c02dd2b732b
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mboersma The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Supersedes:
Updates Cluster API to v1.11.3.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)Fixes #5658
Fixes #5602
Closes #5661
Required Issues/PRs to get this green
Special notes for your reviewer:
TODOs:
Release note: