Summary
In watch mode, when the watched command exceeds the interval and is killed via the timeout path, evalCmdOutput leaks a goroutine per timeout occurrence and reads the shared output buffer concurrently with the still-running child pipeline, which is a data race.
Location
done := make(chan error) // unbuffered
go func() {
err := cmd.Wait()
if err != nil {
done <- fmt.Errorf("command failed to invoke: %v", err)
}
done <- nil
}()
select {
case err := <-done:
return outputBuf.String(), err
case <-timeOut:
cmd.Process.Kill()
return outputBuf.String(), errors.New("command timed out")
}
Problem
Two defects on the timeout path:
-
Goroutine leak. done is unbuffered, and the select abandons it when timeOut fires. The spawned goroutine calls cmd.Wait(); once the killed process is reaped, Wait returns and the goroutine attempts done <- ... with no receiver ever coming, so it blocks forever. Every interval tick that times out leaks one goroutine (plus the reaped-process bookkeeping), for as long as gotify watch runs — which is by design unbounded (for range time.NewTicker(...).C).
-
Data race on outputBuf. When Stdout/Stderr are non-*os.File writers (here a *bytes.Buffer), os/exec spawns internal copy goroutines that write into outputBuf, and normally only cmd.Wait() provides the happens-before edge that makes reading the buffer safe. On the timeout path Process.Kill() is called without Wait(), and outputBuf.String() runs concurrently with those copy goroutines, which may still be draining buffered pipe data from the dying child. Concurrent Buffer.Write and Buffer.String are not safe.
Trigger / Reproduction
Static analysis finding — not confirmed by execution. Run:
gotify watch -n 1 -- sh -c 'sleep 5; echo done'
Every tick kills sleep 5 after 1 s, taking the case <-timeOut: branch each time: one blocked-forever goroutine per tick, plus an unsynchronized read of outputBuf.
Expected Behavior
The timeout path should reap the child (e.g. call cmd.Wait() after Kill() in a separate goroutine, or use exec.CommandContext with a per-run context so cancellation/reaping is handled by the stdlib) and only then read outputBuf; the completion goroutine should never block on an unreceived channel send (e.g. done := make(chan error, 1)).
Actual Behavior
Goroutines accumulate indefinitely across ticks, and outputBuf can be read while exec's copy goroutines are still writing to it.
Impact
Long-running gotify watch deployments that monitor slow commands accumulate leaked goroutines over time (unbounded memory growth). The unsynchronized buffer access is undefined behavior under the Go memory model and can, under -race, flag crashes/misreads; practically it can observe torn/partial output.
Suggested Direction
Minimal fix: make done buffered (make(chan error, 1)), and after cmd.Process.Kill() call <-done (or cmd.Wait()) before returning outputBuf.String() so the child is fully reaped before its output is read. A cleaner alternative is switching to exec.CommandContext(ctx, ...) per run.
Related but distinct: issue #44 asks for a way to disable the timeout entirely; this report concerns the correctness of the existing timeout implementation itself.
Summary
In
watchmode, when the watched command exceeds the interval and is killed via the timeout path,evalCmdOutputleaks a goroutine per timeout occurrence and reads the shared output buffer concurrently with the still-running child pipeline, which is a data race.Location
command/watch.godoWatch→evalCmdOutput(lines ~86–108)Problem
Two defects on the timeout path:
Goroutine leak.
doneis unbuffered, and theselectabandons it whentimeOutfires. The spawned goroutine callscmd.Wait(); once the killed process is reaped,Waitreturns and the goroutine attemptsdone <- ...with no receiver ever coming, so it blocks forever. Every interval tick that times out leaks one goroutine (plus the reaped-process bookkeeping), for as long asgotify watchruns — which is by design unbounded (for range time.NewTicker(...).C).Data race on
outputBuf. WhenStdout/Stderrare non-*os.Filewriters (here a*bytes.Buffer),os/execspawns internal copy goroutines that write intooutputBuf, and normally onlycmd.Wait()provides the happens-before edge that makes reading the buffer safe. On the timeout pathProcess.Kill()is called withoutWait(), andoutputBuf.String()runs concurrently with those copy goroutines, which may still be draining buffered pipe data from the dying child. ConcurrentBuffer.WriteandBuffer.Stringare not safe.Trigger / Reproduction
Static analysis finding — not confirmed by execution. Run:
gotify watch -n 1 -- sh -c 'sleep 5; echo done'Every tick kills
sleep 5after 1 s, taking thecase <-timeOut:branch each time: one blocked-forever goroutine per tick, plus an unsynchronized read ofoutputBuf.Expected Behavior
The timeout path should reap the child (e.g. call
cmd.Wait()afterKill()in a separate goroutine, or useexec.CommandContextwith a per-run context so cancellation/reaping is handled by the stdlib) and only then readoutputBuf; the completion goroutine should never block on an unreceived channel send (e.g.done := make(chan error, 1)).Actual Behavior
Goroutines accumulate indefinitely across ticks, and
outputBufcan be read while exec's copy goroutines are still writing to it.Impact
Long-running
gotify watchdeployments that monitor slow commands accumulate leaked goroutines over time (unbounded memory growth). The unsynchronized buffer access is undefined behavior under the Go memory model and can, under-race, flag crashes/misreads; practically it can observe torn/partial output.Suggested Direction
Minimal fix: make
donebuffered (make(chan error, 1)), and aftercmd.Process.Kill()call<-done(orcmd.Wait()) before returningoutputBuf.String()so the child is fully reaped before its output is read. A cleaner alternative is switching toexec.CommandContext(ctx, ...)per run.Related but distinct: issue #44 asks for a way to disable the timeout entirely; this report concerns the correctness of the existing timeout implementation itself.