📚 Documentation Noob Test Report - December 24, 2024 #7478
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 3 days ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Test Date: December 24, 2024
Pages Visited:
/gh-aw//gh-aw/setup/quick-start//gh-aw/setup/cli//gh-aw/setup/agentic-authoring//gh-aw/examples/issue-pr-events/issueops//gh-aw/examples/scheduled/dailyops/Overall Impression as a New User:
The documentation has a professional, polished appearance with good visual design and clear structure. However, as a complete beginner, I found several areas where the learning curve feels steep and key concepts are not explained before they're referenced.
🔴 Critical Issues Found
1. Missing "What is this?" Explanation
Location: Homepage (
/gh-aw/)Issue: The homepage jumps straight into "AI-powered repository automation" and "natural language workflows" without explaining the fundamental question: What is GitHub Agentic Workflows?
Why this blocks beginners:
Recommendation:
Add a simple 2-3 sentence explanation before the feature list:
2. "Prerequisites" Section is Vague
Location: Quick Start (
/gh-aw/setup/quick-start/)Issue: The prerequisites section says "Agentic Setup" but doesn't clearly list what you actually need before starting.
What's missing:
Recommendation:
Replace vague "Agentic Setup" with concrete bullet points:
3. "Extension" vs "CLI Extension" Confusion
Location: Quick Start - Step 1
Issue: The guide says "Install the extension" but doesn't clearly explain:
Why this is confusing:
A beginner might think "extension" means browser extension or IDE extension. Only after reading carefully do you realize it's a GitHub CLI extension.
Recommendation:
Change "Step 1 — Install the extension" to "Step 1 — Install the GitHub CLI extension (
gh-aw)"🟡 Confusing Areas (Slow Down Learning)
1. Jargon Without Definition
Terms used without explanation:
Recommendation:
Add a "Glossary" section or inline definitions:
2. Quick Start Assumes Too Much Knowledge
Location: Quick Start guide
Issues for beginners:
a) Step 2: "Add a sample workflow"
.github/workflows/b) Step 3: "Add an AI secret"
Recommendation:
Add beginner-friendly context to each step:
3. No Visual Examples or Screenshots
Missing throughout documentation:
Recommendation:
Add screenshots for:
4. Unclear Error Paths
Location: Throughout the guide
Issue: No guidance on what to do when things go wrong
Missing:
Recommendation:
Add a "Troubleshooting Your First Workflow" section:
5. "Understanding Your First Workflow" Lacks Depth
Location: Quick Start
Issue: This section should explain line-by-line what each part of the example workflow does, but likely doesn't go deep enough for beginners.
What beginners need:
🟢 What Works Well
1. Clear Visual Design
The documentation site is modern, well-organized, and easy to navigate. The dark/light theme toggle works perfectly.
2. Good Feature Overview
The feature cards on the homepage give a clear picture of what the tool can do at a high level.
3. Example Categories
Breaking examples into ChatOps, IssueOps, DailyOps, etc. is intuitive and helpful.
4. Navigation Structure
The sidebar navigation is logical: Introduction → Setup → Examples → Reference → Troubleshooting.
5. "RESEARCH PROTOTYPE" Badge
The experimental badge on the homepage sets appropriate expectations that this is evolving.
Recommendations
Quick Wins (High Impact, Low Effort)
Medium Priority
Longer-Term Improvements
Testing Limitations
Note: I was unable to use Playwright for visual screenshots due to network restrictions preventing browser download. This report is based on analyzing the HTML content of the documentation pages. With Playwright working, I would have captured:
Conclusion
The documentation is professionally built and well-organized, but it needs more beginner-friendly scaffolding. The main gaps are:
The documentation assumes readers already understand GitHub Actions, markdown frontmatter, and AI agent concepts. For true beginners, adding more foundational explanations and step-by-step guidance would dramatically improve the getting-started experience.
Suggested First Step: Add a dedicated "Absolute Beginner's Guide" that walks through creating your first workflow from scratch, explaining every single step and concept along the way.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions