Add benchmark comparisons to other solutions in the README.md?

[Curculigo]

Like this:

https://github.com/stephenberry/glaze?tab=readme-ov-file#performance

BTW, where can I ask for newbie questions? README.md mentions Github Discussions. But this repository doesn't have Github Discussions turned on.

[liuzicheng1987]

@Curculigo the benchmarks are run automatically via a GitHub Actions pipelines and we always publish the results. This compares reflect-cpp to other solutions as well as the different formats. We provide links to that in the README.

I think the problem with glaze's benchmarks is that they are basically run on Stephen Berry's PC, and they are static, whereas our benchmarks are run on different operating systems and architectures and adapt to every change to the code.

I think our approach is much better. If we write them into the README, they will become static.

[Curculigo]

@liuzicheng1987 Can you tell me about Github Discussions? README.md mentions Github Discussions. But this repository doesn't have Github Discussions turned on. And the organization's Github Discussions seems to be empty:

https://github.com/getml/getml-community/discussions

So where should I go to have support? I don't need commercial support. I only need a place to have my newbie questions answered.

[Curculigo]

@liuzicheng1987 How to have reflect-cpp to errors on unknown keys (the fields I have not included in the struct) like glaze? Currently, it will happily ignore these keys.

[liuzicheng1987]

@Curculigo you can check the documentation. If you think that something is missing, just open an issue.

As far as your question is concerned, you can use the rfl::NoExtraFields processor:

https://rfl.getml.com/concepts/processors/#supported-processors