You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From AASCU Intermediary feedback session (see docs/aascu_intermediary_feedback_summary.md, pain points A + E):
"Data is getting incorrectly processed when submitted to the PDP where it is causing data from the institutions to have inaccurate values."
"[At one institution] one of the main person retired, and that was the only person who submitted it. No one else knew how to do it. And apparently, this person did it in some way that was unique to how they wanted to do it."
PDP's submission feedback is opaque enough that errors slip through, and submission knowledge tends to live with one person. A clear, human-readable validation report after every upload solves both problems: it catches errors immediately AND becomes the de-facto runbook for whoever inherits the role.
Goal
After every upload, the user sees a clear validation report showing what was accepted, what was rejected, what was transformed, and how this upload compares to the previous one.
Context
From AASCU Intermediary feedback session (see
docs/aascu_intermediary_feedback_summary.md, pain points A + E):PDP's submission feedback is opaque enough that errors slip through, and submission knowledge tends to live with one person. A clear, human-readable validation report after every upload solves both problems: it catches errors immediately AND becomes the de-facto runbook for whoever inherits the role.
Goal
After every upload, the user sees a clear validation report showing what was accepted, what was rejected, what was transformed, and how this upload compares to the previous one.
Scope
is_pell_eligible")Acceptance criteria
Related