Summary
Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-go. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-go) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire.
Findings
- STATEMENT-025 [thrift]: Write statements publish the protocol affected-row counter record as a fetchable application result set (insert/cte_insert -> [num_affected_rows num_inserted_rows], merge -> [num_affected_rows num_updated_rows num_deleted_rows num_inserted_rows], DDL -> [Result]) instead of treating it as transport metadata, so an INSERT looks like a one-row SELECT.
- failing test:
TestWriteStatementReportsAffectedRowsWithoutAResultSet (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
- STATEMENT-025 [sea]: On the SEA/kernel backend the DML counter row is likewise published as a fetchable application result set (insert/cte_insert -> [num_affected_rows num_inserted_rows], merge -> 4 counter columns), so a write is indistinguishable from a one-row SELECT.
- failing test:
TestWriteStatementReportsAffectedRowsWithoutAResultSet (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
- STATEMENT-026 [thrift]: On a reused connection handle a resultless DML/DDL statement still publishes the counter record as a fetchable result set (write_after_select/prepared_switch_execute -> [num_affected_rows num_inserted_rows], ddl_after_select -> [Result]), so the handle never reports zero result columns after a write.
- failing test:
TestReusedStatementClearsResultStateAfterAWrite (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
- STATEMENT-026 [sea]: Same reused-handle violation on the SEA/kernel backend: write_after_select and prepared_switch_execute publish [num_affected_rows num_inserted_rows] instead of zero result columns.
- failing test:
TestReusedStatementClearsResultStateAfterAWrite (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
- STATEMENT-025: A write statement's protocol affected-row counter record is published to the application as a fetchable result set (INSERT/cte_insert -> [num_affected_rows num_inserted_rows], MERGE -> [num_affected_rows num_updated_rows num_deleted_rows num_inserted_rows], DDL -> [Result] on thrift) instead of being treated as transport metadata, so an INSERT looks like a one-row SELECT and callers that branch on "did this statement return rows?" take the wrong branch. Affected on both thrift and sea; the affected-row counts themselves are correct.
- STATEMENT-026: On a reused connection handle a resultless DML/DDL statement still publishes the protocol counter record as a fetchable result set (write_after_select / prepared_switch_execute -> [num_affected_rows num_inserted_rows]; thrift ddl_after_select -> [Result]), so the handle never reports zero result columns after a write. The stale-state half is correct — the previous query's columns are not inherited — but column_count: 0 is violated on both thrift and sea.
Reproduce & Expected
STATEMENT-025 — Validates the RESULT KIND of write statements: a DML statement exposes its affected-row count and NO fetchable result set, and a DDL statement exposes neither.
Reproduce:
INSERT INTO {tableName} VALUES (1, 'a'), (2, 'b')
UPDATE {tableName} SET name = 'c' WHERE id = 2
DELETE FROM {tableName} WHERE id = 1
DELETE FROM {tableName} WHERE id = -12345
MERGE INTO {tableName} AS t
USING (SELECT 2 AS id, 'merged' AS name) AS s
ON t.id = s.id
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET t.name = s.name
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT (id, name) VALUES (s.id, s.name)
WITH src AS (SELECT 3 AS id, 'd' AS name) INSERT INTO {tableName} SELECT id, name FROM src
ALTER TABLE {tableName} ADD COLUMN extra STRING
TRUNCATE TABLE {tableName}
SELECT CAST(7 AS BIGINT) AS num_affected_rows
WITH c AS (SELECT CAST(7 AS BIGINT) AS num_affected_rows) SELECT * FROM c
TABLE {counterViewName}
Expected (per the shared spec):
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- result has 1 column(s)
- col 0, row 0 == 7 (type Int64)
- completes without an exception
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- col 0, row 0 == 7 (type Int64)
- completes without an exception
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- col 0, row 0 == 7 (type Int64)
- full assertion contract:
result:
- label: insert
no_exception: true
- label: insert
no_result_set: true
- label: insert
affected_row_count: 2
- label: update
no_exception: true
- label: update
no_result_set: true
- label: update
affected_row_count: 1
- label: delete
no_exception: true
- label: delete
no_result_set: true
- label: delete
affected_row_count: 1
- label: delete_zero_rows
no_exception: true
- label: delete_zero_rows
no_result_set: true
- label: delete_zero_rows
affected_row_count: 0
- label: merge
no_exception: true
- label: merge
no_result_set: true
- label: merge
affected_row_count_min: 1
- label: cte_insert
no_exception: true
- label: cte_insert
no_result_set: true
- label: cte_insert
affected_row_count: 1
- label: ddl_alter
no_exception: true
- label: ddl_alter
no_result_set: true
- label: ddl_alter
affected_row_count_not_positive: true
- label: ddl_truncate
no_exception: true
- label: ddl_truncate
no_result_set: true
- label: ddl_truncate
affected_row_count_not_positive: true
- label: counter_select
no_exception: true
- label: counter_select
row_count: 1
- label: counter_select
column_count: 1
- label: counter_select
column:
index: 0
row: 0
type: Int64
equals: 7
- label: counter_cte
no_exception: true
- label: counter_cte
row_count: 1
- label: counter_cte
column:
index: 0
row: 0
type: Int64
equals: 7
- label: counter_table
no_exception: true
- label: counter_table
row_count: 1
- label: counter_table
column:
index: 0
row: 0
type: Int64
equals: 7
STATEMENT-026 — Validates that executing a RESULTLESS statement (DML or DDL) on a statement/handle that previously ran a row-returning query REPLACES the statement's result state rather than leaving the earlier quer…
Reproduce:
SELECT 1 AS a, 'x' AS b
INSERT INTO {tableName} VALUES (1, 'a')
SELECT 42 AS only_col
ALTER TABLE {tableName} ADD COLUMN extra STRING
SELECT 1 AS a, 'x' AS b
INSERT INTO {tableName} VALUES (2, 'b')
Expected (per the shared spec):
- completes without an exception
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- result has 2 column(s)
- completes without an exception
- result has 0 column(s)
- completes without an exception
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- result has 1 column(s)
- col 0 is named
only_col
- completes without an exception
- result has 0 column(s)
- completes without an exception
- result has 2 column(s)
- completes without an exception
- result has 0 column(s)
- completes without an exception
- full assertion contract:
result:
- label: baseline_select
no_exception: true
- label: baseline_select
row_count: 1
- label: baseline_select
column_count: 2
- label: write_after_select
no_exception: true
- label: write_after_select
no_result_set: true
- label: write_after_select
column_count: 0
- label: write_after_select
affected_row_count: 1
- label: select_after_write
no_exception: true
- label: select_after_write
row_count: 1
- label: select_after_write
column_count: 1
- label: select_after_write
column:
index: 0
name: only_col
- label: ddl_after_select
no_exception: true
- label: ddl_after_select
no_result_set: true
- label: ddl_after_select
column_count: 0
- label: prepared_baseline
no_exception: true
- label: prepared_baseline
metadata_not_null: true
- label: prepared_baseline
column_count: 2
- label: prepared_switch
no_exception: true
- label: prepared_switch
metadata_is_null: true
- label: prepared_switch
column_count: 0
- label: prepared_switch_execute
no_exception: true
- label: prepared_switch_execute
no_result_set: true
- label: prepared_switch_execute
affected_row_count: 1
Context
Summary
Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-go. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-go) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire.
Findings
TestWriteStatementReportsAffectedRowsWithoutAResultSet(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)TestWriteStatementReportsAffectedRowsWithoutAResultSet(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)TestReusedStatementClearsResultStateAfterAWrite(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)TestReusedStatementClearsResultStateAfterAWrite(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)Reproduce & Expected
STATEMENT-025 — Validates the RESULT KIND of write statements: a DML statement exposes its affected-row count and NO fetchable result set, and a DDL statement exposes neither.
Reproduce:
Expected (per the shared spec):
STATEMENT-026 — Validates that executing a RESULTLESS statement (DML or DDL) on a statement/handle that previously ran a row-returning query REPLACES the statement's result state rather than leaving the earlier quer…
Reproduce:
Expected (per the shared spec):
only_colContext