From 1cf5a0ee1accae2244e4095dabd1821bf95bbee2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Thomas=20K=C3=B6ppe?= Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 16:11:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [mem.res.pool.ctor] Reword awkward "calls will be fewer" in note It seems much simpler to just say "there will be fewer calls". --- source/memory.tex | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/source/memory.tex b/source/memory.tex index c2a19ebbb6..eb593459ad 100644 --- a/source/memory.tex +++ b/source/memory.tex @@ -8176,9 +8176,8 @@ The resulting object will hold a copy of \tcode{upstream}, but will not own the resource to which \tcode{upstream} points. \begin{note} -The intention is that calls to \tcode{upstream->allocate()} -will be substantially fewer than calls to \tcode{this->allocate()} -in most cases. +The intention is that in most cases there will be substantially fewer +calls to \tcode{upstream->allocate()} than to \tcode{this->allocate()}. \end{note} The behavior of the pooling mechanism is tuned according to the value of the \tcode{opts} argument.