Author: aestheticyt
Channel: #feedback
Link: https://discord.com/channels/1405685085923049482/1405686161791516873/1539105983563960412
Description
Add a feature to bind integrations to VMs without requiring a tag. Specifically, introduce an "isolated" tag (or similar mechanism) that unbinds a VM from the LLM integration.
Context
This feedback came from exe testing. The use case is to have more granular control over which VMs have access to integrations, without relying solely on tag-based binding.
Related
This may be related to integration access control, particularly in scenarios where VMs need to be isolated from certain services (e.g., LLM gateways when using tailscale exit nodes).
Author: aestheticyt
Channel: #feedback
Link: https://discord.com/channels/1405685085923049482/1405686161791516873/1539105983563960412
Description
Add a feature to bind integrations to VMs without requiring a tag. Specifically, introduce an "isolated" tag (or similar mechanism) that unbinds a VM from the LLM integration.
Context
This feedback came from exe testing. The use case is to have more granular control over which VMs have access to integrations, without relying solely on tag-based binding.
Related
This may be related to integration access control, particularly in scenarios where VMs need to be isolated from certain services (e.g., LLM gateways when using tailscale exit nodes).