Deploying to main from @ amaranth-lang/rfcs@98c79d3 🚀

Author: whitequark

rfcs/0002-interfaces.html

@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ <h2 id="naming-questions"><a class="header" href="#naming-questions">Naming ques
 <li><code>Signature.is_implemented_by</code> is verbose (@jfng)</li>
 </ul>
 </li>
-<li>Should <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forward</code> be named something else, like <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forwarded</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forwarding</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.flip</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.transpose</code> or ``amaranth.lib.wiring.transpose<code>or</code>amaranth.lib.wiring.inner`?
+<li>Should <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forward</code> be named something else, like <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forwarded</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forwarding</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.flip</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.transpose</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.transpose</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.inner</code>?
 <ul>
 <li>having two essentially unrelated operations called <code>flip</code> when one is already confusing is too much (@whitequark)</li>
 <li>reflective programming is a thing (@zyp)</li>

rfcs/print.html

@@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ <h2 id="naming-questions"><a class="header" href="#naming-questions">Naming ques
 <li><code>Signature.is_implemented_by</code> is verbose (@jfng)</li>
 </ul>
 </li>
-<li>Should <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forward</code> be named something else, like <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forwarded</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forwarding</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.flip</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.transpose</code> or ``amaranth.lib.wiring.transpose<code>or</code>amaranth.lib.wiring.inner`?
+<li>Should <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forward</code> be named something else, like <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forwarded</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.forwarding</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.flip</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.transpose</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.transpose</code> or <code>amaranth.lib.wiring.inner</code>?
 <ul>
 <li>having two essentially unrelated operations called <code>flip</code> when one is already confusing is too much (@whitequark)</li>
 <li>reflective programming is a thing (@zyp)</li>