cc-pdm-1.0.LICENSE false positive

[armijnhemel]

Description

When scanning:

https://github.com/mirror/busybox/blob/master/docs/draft-coar-cgi-v11-03-clean.html#L600

the result is cc-pdm-1.0 which is incorrect, as only 4 words are matched.

{
      "path": "busybox-1.37.0/docs/draft-coar-cgi-v11-03-clean.html",
      "type": "file",
      "detected_license_expression": null,
      "detected_license_expression_spdx": null,
      "license_detections": [],
      "license_clues": [
        {
          "license_expression": "cc-pdm-1.0",
          "license_expression_spdx": "CC-PDM-1.0",
          "from_file": "busybox-1.37.0/docs/draft-coar-cgi-v11-03-clean.html",
          "start_line": 600,
          "end_line": 600,
          "matcher": "3-seq",
          "score": 2.15,
          "matched_length": 4,
          "match_coverage": 2.15,
          "rule_relevance": 100,
          "rule_identifier": "cc-pdm-1.0.LICENSE",
          "rule_url": "https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/tree/develop/src/licensedcode/data/licenses/cc-pdm-1.0.LICENSE"
        }
      ],
      "percentage_of_license_text": 0.04,
      "scan_errors": []
    },

[armijnhemel]

So the text here is actually an IETF draft, which probably comes with its own conditions/license.

[pombredanne]

@JahanzaibMohsin9
Thank for this the PR #<YOUR_PR_NUMBER> to address this issue: #<MY_ISSUE_NUMBER>.
Your lack of appreciation for human to human communication in message designed to be read by human is rather disconcerting. You do not seem to care to even review or read what your bot or agent does .