Skip to content

[2.0] formulation - docs make nosense #1083

Description

@jkowalleck

the CDX 2.0 formulation docsmake nosens

for example:

"description": "A reference to the component or service that provided the input to the task (e.g., reference to a service with data flow value of `inbound`)",

A reference to the component or service [...]

service is done with CDX 2.0 - we only have components.

[...] (e.g., reference to a service with data flow value of inbound)

where does this inbound come from? is this expected to be an enum value? if so, it is not defined nowhere.

same for this

"description": "A reference to the component or service that received or stored the input if not the task itself (e.g., a local, named storage workspace)",

.. where comes this "outbound" from?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions