-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
[Model] MinimumDiscretePlanarInverseKinematics #994
Description
Motivation
Adds a robotics-facing optimization problem that connects naturally to the existing QUBO hub via a concrete sampled-angle formulation.
Definition
Name: MinimumDiscretePlanarInverseKinematics
Reference: Hadi Salloum, Sergei Savin, Yaroslav Kholodov, Gleb Ryzhakov, Mirko Farina, and Ivan Oseledets, "Quantum annealing for inverse kinematics in robotics", Scientific Reports 16(1):4244, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34346-z
Given:
- positive link lengths
l_1, ..., l_n, - a target point
g = (g_x, g_y)inR^2, - for each link
j, a finite set of candidate absolute orientationsPhi_j = {phi_{j,0}, ..., phi_{j,m_j-1}}, - for each
j = 2, ..., n, an admissible pair setA_jcontained in{0, ..., m_{j-1}-1} x {0, ..., m_j-1},
choose indices a_j in {0, ..., m_j-1} such that (a_{j-1}, a_j) in A_j for every j = 2, ..., n, minimizing
|| sum_{j=1}^n l_j (cos(phi_{j,a_j}), sin(phi_{j,a_j})) - g ||_2^2.
The pair sets A_j encode local joint-feasibility between consecutive links; for example, they can enforce joint limits on the relative angle phi_{j,a_j} - phi_{j-1,a_{j-1}}.
Variables
- Count:
n, one variable per link - Per-variable domain:
x_j in {0, ..., m_j-1} - Meaning:
x_j = ameans linkjuses sampled absolute orientationphi_{j,a}
Schema (data type)
Type name: MinimumDiscretePlanarInverseKinematics
Variants: none initially
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| link_lengths | list of positive reals | the link lengths l_1, ..., l_n |
| target_point | pair of reals | the target point g = (g_x, g_y) |
| orientation_samples | list of angle lists | the sampled absolute orientations Phi_j for each link |
| allowed_pairs | list of pair sets | the admissible pair sets A_j for j = 2, ..., n |
Complexity
- Best known exact algorithm:
O(prod_{j=1}^n m_j)by exhaustive enumeration over all sampled orientation choices; with uniform sample countm, this isO(m^n) - References: definition/discretization style from Salloum et al. (2025), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34346-z ; broader IK optimization context from Hongkai Dai, Gregory Izatt, and Russ Tedrake, "Global inverse kinematics via mixed-integer convex optimization", International Journal of Robotics Research 38(12-13):1420-1441, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364919846512
Extra Remark
Using absolute link orientations instead of local joint angles is deliberate: after one-hot lifting, the workspace position becomes linear in the binary selector variables, which makes the companion QUBO reduction genuinely quadratic.
Reduction Rule Crossref
- [Rule] MinimumDiscretePlanarInverseKinematics to QUBO #995 [Rule] MinimumDiscretePlanarInverseKinematics to QUBO
How to solve
- It can be solved by (existing) brute force.
- It can be solved by reducing to QUBO via [Rule] MinimumDiscretePlanarInverseKinematics to QUBO #995.
- Other, refer to ...
Example Instance
Take:
link_lengths = [2, 1]target_point = (2, 1)orientation_samples = [[0, pi/2], [0, pi/2]]allowed_pairs = [{(0,0), (0,1), (1,1)}]
So the second link may either keep the first link's orientation or turn counterclockwise by pi/2.
Expected Outcome
An optimal configuration is:
x = [0, 1]
This means:
- link 1 uses angle
0, - link 2 uses angle
pi/2.
The resulting end-effector position is
(2 cos 0, 2 sin 0) + (cos(pi/2), sin(pi/2)) = (2, 0) + (0, 1) = (2, 1),
so the optimal objective value is 0.
BibTeX
@article{Salloum2025IKQUBO,
title={Quantum annealing for inverse kinematics in robotics},
author={Salloum, Hadi and Savin, Sergei and Kholodov, Yaroslav and Ryzhakov, Gleb and Farina, Mirko and Oseledets, Ivan},
journal={Scientific Reports},
volume={16},
number={1},
pages={4244},
year={2025},
doi={10.1038/s41598-025-34346-z},
url={https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34346-z}
}
@article{DaiIzattTedrake2019GlobalIK,
title={Global inverse kinematics via mixed-integer convex optimization},
author={Dai, Hongkai and Izatt, Gregory and Tedrake, Russ},
journal={The International Journal of Robotics Research},
volume={38},
number={12-13},
pages={1420--1441},
year={2019},
doi={10.1177/0278364919846512},
url={https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364919846512}
}Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Status